this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
33 points (92.3% liked)

Dungeons and Dragons

11033 readers
13 users here now

A community for discussion of all things Dungeons and Dragons! This is the catch all community for anything relating to Dungeons and Dragons, though we encourage you to see out our Networked Communities listed below!

/c/DnD Network Communities

Other DnD and related Communities to follow*

DnD/RPG Podcasts

*Please Follow the rules of these individual communities, not all of them are strictly DnD related, but may be of interest to DnD Fans

Rules (Subject to Change)

Format: [Source Name] Article Title

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheAndrewBrown@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

I’m not sure yet where I stand on using AI to enhance images you made. I think if it’s for commercial purposes, it shouldn’t be ok since it would essentially be profiting off others work.

But in this case, my big issue is they did this without telling their team or bosses. This is essentially no different from hiring a third party to enhance your work so you don’t have to do as much and pocketing the difference. Sounds like they’re updating their guidelines though and I hope this person is fired or won’t be contracted again. They should probably switch the art to the earlier versions in D&D Beyond and future printings too. Which is another thing, the “enhanced” one doesn’t seem better enough to have warranted this type of risk. I’m not sure what that person was thinking.

[–] ThirdWorldOrder@feddit.nl -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh no. He used AI to enhance his own images.

No trial. Straight to execution.

[–] fhein@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Well this is lemmy and not reddit, so surely people will read the actual article and not just the clickbait half-true headline.