This is not fair for new authors, but maybe good for science. The Nobel laureate is playing with their own reputation, not the reputation of the journal doing the peer review. Plus reviewers may well see themselves as less qualified, and it thus makes sense to only reject such a paper if you spot an obvious error. What do you think?
this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2022
5 points (100.0% liked)
Open Science Feed
593 readers
1 users here now
Open science, open research or open scholarship, is an increasingly important discussion topic. However, it can be difficult to know where to go for information. This subreddit will collate the latest from the world of open science, including but not limited to open access, open data, open education, open peer review, and open source.
We use term science in the international sense: from the natural sciences to the humanities and everything in between.
We are also on
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS