As always, gonna wait and see what people who know that stuff say about it. Feels like pr.
this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
70 points (91.7% liked)
Technology
34904 readers
303 users here now
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I know a little about stuff.
Similar to the 2022 firing, The fusion charge itself was net energy positive. That is, the fusion production was greater than the input of laser shot used, which means they're closing in on optimal ignition.
However: the total cycle energy was terrible. The lasers NIF uses are quite old due to the speed of government and the sheer size of the project, plus thermodynamics hates an engineer's guts. so their total real input electrical energy to generate such a laser pulse of a few joules was hundreds of thousands of times greater than the actual fusion output.
This is great for understanding the physics of conditions that fusion requires, but terrible for generating power.
Paywall.. lol
Sorry, I meant to add this but forgot https://archive.is/https://www.afr.com/world/north-america/us-scientists-repeat-fusion-power-breakthrough-20230807-p5dudn
still decades away
Yeah, let me guess - about 4 of them, like for the past 8 of them?
They are getting more out than the laser puts in.
But the laser is about 10% efficient for starters, completely outweighing the generated power.
This is about testing nuclear weapon designs, this is not a stepping stone to a power plant. The people building it would tell you that. In fact, they did, repeatedly, in their original press conference.
This lab would have been shut down decades ago by oil and coal politicians if it were about power generation.
This is not about weapons. That's a ludicrous viewpoint. We've been able to create fusion weapons for decades now by starting them with fission. There's no way to build a pocket fusion device so it would only ever be a giant nuke, which we can already build.
No, this is really real research. Oil and coal barons know the end is coming for oil and coal, that's why they're the primary card holders in renewables too. They don't actually need to burn fossil fuels, it's just more profitable to do so right now. Once it's not, they'll just turn to the next most profitable thing they've got their fingers in.
He's partially true- LLNL and NIF's primary focus used to be weapons. But really nuclear weapons have hit the end of their development. This is all high theoretical physics at this point.
Yo, watch the press conference where the program director and scientists presented the original positive-energy result.
They were unanimously very clear that this research is about non-explosively testing whether our warheads still work.