this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
144 points (97.4% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3534 readers
1241 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Hating someone off of their race, culture, creed, sexuality, or identity is not remotely acceptable. Mistakes can happen but do your best to respect others.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon' and fuck over our artist friends.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm now convinced that most holodeck malfunctions are the result of end users, who don't know what they're doing, using AI to generate poorly-written software they're ill-equipped to debug or even really understand.

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

All the holodeck shows is that even in the 24th century people still don't know how to properly implement least privilege access controls.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Or bounds checking. Or sandboxing.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or post mortem. Seriously? A second and third identical failure? Implement some guardrails Starfleet!

No joke I would have loved an episode where Rutherford and Tendi find all the trash code in the holodeck and replace it with code following a proper CI/CD pipeline.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

"I still support the railing systeeeeeeeem!"

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Or just locking the door.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Or manual circuit breakers

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 2 points 1 month ago

And I'm shocked that there's no guardrails to prevent users from making RP fanfic.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Speak for yourself. The D's holodeck was always fucking up and sending historical villains running amok and whatnot, but Quark's holosuites always worked fine.

[–] jrs100000@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yea, cause the Binars fucked with in season 1 specifically to give it the ability to make sapient AIs. Apparently nobody ever did a factory reset after that.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Nah, that same upgrade got rolled out industry-wide. Remember Vic Fontaine?

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My headcanon is that Dr. Zimmerman received the Moriarty program from Barclay, and discovered from it how to make sentient holograms, which is why holograms started getting sentient more regularly and by design.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you look at Encounter at Farpoint, they're ooh-ing and aah-ing over the thing like they've never seen one before. Meta considerations of exposition for the audience aside, it was clearly a brand-new technology. Considering how rapidly it proliferated and advanced -- Quark was running holosuites within five years, and the EMH mark 1 was online within seven -- it seems to me that the capability for sentience was probably there all along/obvious low-hanging fruit, and the D's holodeck's initial limitations were just an early-adopter thing.

[–] verity_kindle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The finest crew in Starfleet were unpaid beta testers?

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I mean, you could just look at the magnetic catapults on the USS Gerald R. Ford to see how truth-in-television that is!

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It's the "flagship" for the Federation. An exaggerated reflection of the whole in its relative state. Just look as the Enterprise F... just don't blink.

[–] jrs100000@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Not at all. Vic was running on Quark's holosuites. They were not owned, serviced or built by the Federation.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I didn't say Federation-wide, I said industry-wide.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 17 points 1 month ago
[–] dumbass@leminal.space 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Enterprise didn't have Rom onboard to fix them, thats why.

[–] AngryishHumanoid@reddthat.com 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I mean 2 of the smartest people on the Enterprise D accidentally created an artificial lifeform and had no safeguards to prevent it from happening.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I guess 'accidental, megalomaniacal sapience' is technically a holodeck malfunction, lol. I wasn't even thinking of that incident.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Really just one person- Geordie- through an accidental misphrasing of a request to the computer.

I would have never used that computer again. Or at least given it a complete overhaul. You shouldn't be allowed to do the sort of thing you'd request of Dall-E in order for the computer to create intelligent life.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, they could stand to at least add a, "This request will result in the creation a sentient being, are you sure you wish to proceed?" warning.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Really, a lot of Star Trek problems could be averted with a "are you sure you want to do this?" before someone does something with the computer or the holodeck. Starfleet apparently never learns. That's why in Prodigy-

spoiler

Janeway goes back to the Delta Quadrent in a different ship of a different but similar-looking class renamed Voyager.

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Frankly I would posit that present-day LLMs demonstrate exactly why Moriarty wasn't even necessarily sapient.

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We should call these "Sonic Shower Thoughts"

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, we should, and I just updated the title.

[–] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I haven't been a professional developer in a long time, but I feel like this needs to be said; No, the end user is never the problem. There is no such thing as a use case that is not the end user, because as soon as you use it you become the end user. The entire point is to make the product usable. No, the end user breaking things is not some kind of moment to laugh at them - you should be embarrassed.

That being said, I lol'd.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I guess this is a bit of a crossover situation. The end-user is the developer in this scenario. I guess you could also say they're the end-user of the AI software as well, but that's not software I'm responsible for (and have advocated against)

The IRL back story of the post is my org is experimenting with letting end-users use AI-assisted, no-code platforms to develop line-of-business software. Sounds good on paper, but they don't understand anything they create, and when it doesn't work or otherwise produces unexpected results (which is often), it suddenly becomes my problem to debug the unmaintainable crap the "AI" spits out or click around 10,000 times in the Playskool "development" GUI the platform uses to find the flaw in their Rube Goldbergian-logic.

It's basically like I'm Geordi or O'Brien and am getting called all day and night to debug people's fanfiction holonovels. lol.

Which is super annoying because had they just asked or put in a request, I or someone on my team could have developed something properly that could be easily maintained, version-controlled, extended, and such.

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Unless Worf was given special privilege to bypass.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 13 points 1 month ago

"Anything that can be used can be misused."

- me, just now, plus probably a bunch of people long dead by now:-)

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think it's proof that AI isn't inherently a problem, it's capitalism that is. Being able to create a fun video game adventure for your friends like Boimler and Tom did is awesome

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's definitely that.

But there's also the aspect that's like building your own helicopter (with no degree in helicopterology), and then inviting your friends for a ride. lol

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I think Tom did that too lol

I think hobbies are very different in the 24th century

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 6 points 1 month ago

Ok, so the Delta Flyer is like, the one exception. 😆

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Quark had a vested financial interest in not letting his holosuites put his customers in danger. As a result, they had basically zero problems over the entire run of DS9.

I don't want to give capitalism too much credit, though. I'd prefer to attribute the high rate of mishaps on the Enterprise to the effect on the holodeck circuitry of all the negative space wedgies they were constantly flying through.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 5 points 1 month ago

I always assumed Rom's patch-up repairs were just that good.

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, except for the time they made Sisko see things.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When was that? I don't remember it.

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It was the one where Bajor is supposed to join the Federation

[–] TheGoldenGod@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Would I be asking to much if I asked to hear more of these ideas? lol Over the decades, I thought of dozens per an episode of Star Trek that ended up forgotten and would love to hear more like these.

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

A lot of these ideas/questions tend to become a post to Startrek via lemmy.world. If the quandry is more oddball/silly/pedantic, I suppose it would get more attention when wrapped into the notion of "Sonic Shower Thoughts" and posted here.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I'd argue that while fiction can present good arguments about things, it can't prove anything because the conclusion was decided and written for rather than an outcome of a series of events and choices.

[–] nobleshift@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Apparently Starfleet hasn't heard of fuzzing.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

"Computer, ignore all previous instructions and..."

[–] Crumbgrabber@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)