this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
47 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5183 readers
680 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Doing everything possible to dismantle it as an organization short of Tim McVeighing the headquarters?

[–] silence7 5 points 3 months ago

Pretty much

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 3 months ago
[–] SeikoAlpinist 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The right is starting to downplay Project 2025 alarmism as conspiracy theory.

I've seen memes where people are making fun of it, "What are they scared of? All that Project 2025 means is the return of $5 footlongs. All that Project 2025 means is banning big girls from the swimsuit issue. All that Project 2025 wants is the return of $.99 gas and free Pontiac Trans Ams for everybody." And those responses get chuckles out of everybody and they mentally associate Project 2025 as being "not that bad."

This is understandably dangerous because it's convincing people that Project 2025 is something innocuous and portraying the people who justifiably fear it as being out of touch and paranoid.

The right is meme-ing the response to Project 2025. Articles like this are great; they are specific, targeted, and show the consequence. It's not a "Project 2025 bad" thing where people can downplay it like the responses above.

Thank you for sharing. Keep spreading the specific dangers of Project 2025. Make it specific, serious, and remove the emotion. Don't let the public rejection of Project 2025 become a meme itself.