this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
1904 points (97.7% liked)

Memes

45589 readers
1248 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gon@lemmy.world 177 points 1 year ago (3 children)

A classic. So many questions arise from this simple text+image post:

  1. Is this person's child named really "Strairdrac The Netherwatcher"?
  2. Is Strairdrac even human?
  3. Why does Strairdrac want to teach crabs how to read?
  4. Why is it considered forbidden knowledge?
  5. What other knowledge is forbidden?

We will never have all the answers. Still, the questions are themselves a sort of answer.

[–] esadatari@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago

to know all the answers is… forbidden knowledge

[–] goddard_guryon@sopuli.xyz 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  1. Strairdrac is three crabs in a trenchcoat, now teaching others of his kind how to blend in with humans
[–] EvilEyedPanda@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Crab people

Crab people

Taste like Crab, walk like people

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 159 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I get the "haha" of this particular search getting reported on...but I think that this sort of surveillance is definitely stepping into creepy territory that will end up doing more harm than good.

There were definitely web searches I performed about topics back when I was younger that I would never want my parents to know. When you live in an oppressive household where you are taught never to think outside of the box or be anything your parents don't want you to be, having the internet available is supposed to be a path to liberation.

If they want to set up filters that block certain results, fine. But tattling is just unethical, especially if the child does not know their search history is being monitored by their parents.

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago

It's perfect conditioning to accept authoritarian rule, and constant surveillance as normal.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (10 children)

if only there was a Black mirror episode about the dangers of being an overbearing parent.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This sort of oppressive situation is my childhood in a nutshell. And you're right, it's entirely unethical, and in combination with other factors can be used as a factor in psychological abuse. I know I at least am traumatized from it, and surveillance was definitely one of many signifigant factors.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 135 points 1 year ago (19 children)

Stop spying on your kid... Jesus.

[–] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 93 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Kids need access to the internet at a super young age these days for school. If you don't have some sort of filter in place when they are in single digits or tweens you are just negligent. The internet has some dark corners.

[–] cynetri@midwest.social 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I don't mind just filters, but reporting it to the parent doesn't sit right with me. It probably depends on the parent though

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sounddrill@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz 22 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Harder the surveillance, harder the kid works to bypass them

Kids are smart, good on OOP to teach their kids to use a VPN, about dual booting, and more

[–] candybrie@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the kid is old enough to purposely bypass the security, they're probably around the right age to find some of the stuff on the other side. But you don't want them accidentally stumbling into it because they searched something seemingly innocent.

[–] MajickmanW@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This brought a memory rushing back of me and a family friend in the mid 90s using the family computer to find funny websites.

Us: "Let's search butt.com!"

My godfather: "NOOOOO!!!"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] StoicImpala@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

It's possible to block without spying on though.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Solaris1789@jlai.lu 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Even worse using kaspersky...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Rac3r4Life@lemmy.world 115 points 1 year ago (7 children)

When I was a kid (way too many years ago) my parents gave up trying to restrict my Internet usage because no matter what they did I could easily get around it. I knew more about networking than they did. Then I grew up to become an IT administrator.

[–] Countless@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 year ago (10 children)

The question is,will you be able to restrict YOUR kids?

[–] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

See instead of blacklisting websites you whitelist instead

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 year ago

Don't restrict but rather educate and guide them. I would probably fail but hey: I tried.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My mom asked my uncle to restric access.
I researched how to unblock it during my time :)
Was seemingly IP-based and the router probably just created an DHCP reservation for my device. Changing IP to static and done. They should do it via MAC. And even that is useless nowadays.

Edit: Also work in IT now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] froh42@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I gave my kids completely open internet access and just chose to talk with them on what they might encounter. If I'd locked their devices, they'd just went online at a friend's place.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mithbt@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I didn't restrict my kids Internet access, but I did tell them that even though I'm not tracking everything they're doing online, the ISP, the school, upstream providers, search engines, social medias, advertisers, and pretty much everyone else will be.

[–] SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And this is why kids should grow up with increasingly restrictive parental control software. It's educational.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] raubarno@lemmy.ml 109 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
[–] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Illegal crab learning, alerting the authorities

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 104 points 1 year ago

Dudes remove that spyware from your Networks omg

[–] Imgonnatrythis@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

I should hope so. You want the crabs taking over?

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago

I had less problems with my childs long before internet

[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago

Forbidden knowledge. Oooh.

[–] lunaticneko@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

Too late.

CRAB PEOPLE CRAB PEOPLE!

[–] boratul@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

"Straidrac The Netherwatcher" is quite a curios kind

[–] tunahanyilmaz@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Literally 1984

[–] krakenfury@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 year ago

Is this a joke about rust?

[–] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You have learned the forbidden knowledge of the crab people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Norgur@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, how else would we continue to subdue the
CRAB PEOPLE

CRAB PEOPLE

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChargedBasisGrand@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

computer spyware taught me not to trust computers, my parents, or corporations
it also taught me how to format drives and reinstall operating systems

[–] BoneDaddy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I still have ptsd from Kaspersky

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›