this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
26 points (96.4% liked)

Australia

3576 readers
117 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tip of the iceberg when it comes to examining the corruption of land ownership in Australia. It's hardly talked about. The linked article doesn't even talk about it.

The public as a whole (and traditional owners) should be the only financial beneficiaries of rezoning.

I suspect private maximisation of rezoning profits is the reason behind why urban developments here are almost universally that awful single-story no-greenspace roof-to-roof packed suburban hellscape.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] joao@aussie.zone 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A pair of would-be developers with links to an international gold mining company have lost their legal fight for $5.5 million in compensation after a rural acreage they were land-banking near Coffs Harbour was swallowed up by the Pacific Highway upgrade.

Couldn't have started in a worse way if you wanted my simpathy.

[–] Speculater@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Land squatting and cock blocking public infrastructure for personal gain is pretty low on my sympathy list.

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't get it, am I meant to have sympathy for this couple? They speculated on the value of some land going up, it did, they thought they deserved more. Boo hoo.

[–] rcbrk@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I can never quite tell with articles sometimes..

Among many elements of the story that absolutely fail to raise sympathy:

[...] They planned to subdivide their block into 26 lots once the land was rezoned as residential, live on one block and drip-feed two or three others on to the market each year.

...just what we need -- a drip-feed of low-density housing.

[–] nevetsg@aussie.zone 6 points 3 months ago
[–] rcbrk@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago