this post was submitted on 14 May 2022
25 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

34448 readers
329 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

UC-Berkeley’s Nicholas Weaver has been studying cryptocurrency for years. He thinks it’s a terrible idea that will end in disaster.

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reactorFigure@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's probably because he's jealous. To the moon!

[–] hanabatake@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So the stock market and the bond market are a positive-sum game. There are more winners than losers. Cryptocurrency starts with zero-sum. So it starts with a world where there can be no more winning than losing. We have systems like this. It’s called the horse track. It’s called the casino. Cryptocurrency investing is really provably gambling in an economic sense. And then there’s designs where those power bills have to get paid somewhere. So instead of zero-sum, it becomes deeply negative-sum.

[–] angarabebesi@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

anyone who thinks the stock and bond markets to be a positive sum game have skipped the last 100 years of financial history :)

[–] Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I always find it interesting that many of the harsh criticisms of cryptocurrency can be said of traditional currency and other assets. In the interview he even stated that the crypto world is speeding through the growing pains traditional markets had when they were not regulated.

[–] iam0day@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

But now traditional currencies are regulated and no longer suffer from those problems, but cryptocurrencies are going through the same problems causing quite a few problems.

[–] angarabebesi@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What I do with my own time and money does not concern Mr Nicholas Weaver.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

sure, but that's such a childish response

[–] angarabebesi@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

But it's true. I don't need to justify how and why I spend my money.

[–] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why are you taking this guy's opinion so weirdly personal?

[–] angarabebesi@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's the attitude I have a problem with: some people are so arrogant that they think it's ok to decide for others.

[–] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

I don't think anyone is deciding for you. Someone commenting on a subject doesn't inherently imply they're making decisions for the people related to said subject.

[–] zksmk@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

You don't need to, but it would be healthy.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago

It absolutely does, because if you're dabbling in crypto, it affects others too

[–] iam0day@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

This article is great.