this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
172 points (95.7% liked)

Comics

5922 readers
7 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 56 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I'm glad one of the eternal spectres of death was female-coded so we know it's not a gay romance between two personifications of the grave.

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 46 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I’m glad we can live in an era of skeleton boobs.

[–] cerement 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 9 points 4 months ago

I accept this reasoning, silicone boobs will now be randomly generated on 20% of skeletons.

[–] mke@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I'm getting a bit tired of seeing boobs nonsensically attached to concepts/objects. It's not like female coding characters is a sin per se, but I often find that the material would lose nothing in its absence. Like nowβ€”there's an entire panel dedicated to showing their love. So why bother?

So yeah, I dislike it and also think it's unnecessarily.

That said, if by "so we know it's not a gay romance" you mean that to be the artist's intent, I don't see why that must be the case. Without looking into them, it seems just as likely that they could've simply not thought about it at all. Maybe they're straight and just drew that. While it wouldn't be LGBT+ inclusive, it needn't necessarily be "so that people don't think it's gay."

Hope I didn't wildly misread or overanalyze your comment. You're clearly not glad, but I can't tell if you're adding the last part for the sake of humor, or if you were bothered by what you believed to be a possible LGBT+ exclusionary depiction of romance.

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Heh, your reaction is totally valid, I had the same thoughts when I was looking at the comic. I added "so people don't think it's gay" just to be funny, I don't know anything about the artist. I was mainly drawing attention to the fact that--as you just said--nobody has to do this. We get the joke without the tits.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago

We should give one of the skeletons a penis bulge

[–] uis@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago

Death personification in russian is female. So it wouldn't be hay anyway.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

You have a problem with other people expressing sexuality through their art?

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

would that be a reverse dab since its pointing down and not up?

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] uis@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago

She also fridge