UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1234 readers

17 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.

New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide

Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.

Community Spotlight

Useful Links

Community Rules

Follow the Code of Conduct.
Posts must be on-topic.
No duplicate posts.
No commercial activity.
No memes.
Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.

Other Communities

!uapmemes@lemmy.world

If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SignullGone@lemmy.world

HM05_Me@lemmy.world

Making Sense of the UFO Hearing with Shane Harris | The Lawfare Podcast (www.lawfaremedia.org)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by cia@lemm.ee to c/uap@lemmy.world

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This is an interesting discussion on The Lawfare Podcast with Washington Post national security reporter Shane Harris. They discuss the recent Oversight Committee hearing and the UAP phenomenon more broadly. Harris seems fairly open-minded about the claims being made and while maintaining a healthy level of skepticism.

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

When you consider the reputation he has as a national security journalist, it is remarkable he's engaging in a discussion like this at all, especially in such a serious forum. But he has a history of this, which I really appreciate.

[–] SignullGone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I second this recommendation. I listened to it earlier today and found myself in agreement with practically everything OP said. I would have been interested in hearing their perspective on the Inspector General receiving evidence from firsthand witnesses to substantiate Mr. Grusch's claims. Perhaps they were not aware of this, or they might have chosen to only discuss the hearing and the information that was publicly available. Nonetheless, they've gained another listener.