this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
18 points (100.0% liked)

Aotearoa / New Zealand

1630 readers
77 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month's banner?

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I've never seen an entire tower fall over like that, that's kinda terrifying.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, that’s not very typical, I’d like to make that point.

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's not supposed to look like that

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 months ago

Well the front is not supposed to fall off.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I’ve never seen an entire tower fall over like that, that’s kinda terrifying.

Me neither! I wonder what caused it. Looks like maybe some bolts came off the feet? Since normally there would be huge concrete pads that they are connected to.

[–] FloofahNZ@lemmy.nz 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There are, I guess, 4 tower feet, they are very big structures. So my guess is that the "workers" were told remove the leg bolts, sand-blast the foot, then renew the bolts.

"Now guys, I’m off for a smoko, have it done before I’m back". "OK guv".

Instead of doing it one foot at a time, the obvious method, the "workers" then rush off, "Hey Mick, you do leg one, Jim you do leg 2, Manuel you do leg 3, Franco you do leg 4". "OK let’s go".

In 10 minutes all the bolts are removed, the wind picks up, the lateral force on the cables increases and bang, down she goes.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Haha who put the project manager in charge 😆

[–] FloofahNZ@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 months ago

Occam’s Razor strikes again.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 3 points 3 months ago

Reading the updated story, it definitely sounds like poor procedures.

[–] NoRamyunForYou@lemmy.nz 3 points 3 months ago

Apparently there's some rumours going around that they were doing some maintenance work on the pole when it happened. Don't know how true it is though.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Rusted to hell, would be my guess.

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

One update said there was no corrosion damage. That was my guess, too. The mystery continues! Maybe eroding soil?

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 months ago

You'd expect to see the concrete base come out if that happened. It does sound more like poor maintenance than anything else.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's a good guess. I presume they do regular inspections, so it would be interesting to know how this got missed.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Funnily enough, I just watched a YouTube video of yet another bridge collapse in the states, if it's anything like that case, the corrosion and decay would have been duly noted on successive inspections, and duly ignored by the powers that be.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I wonder if we will ever know, or because they are a SOE they may fall outside the power of anyone to investigate them.

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's not a thing at all. SOEs face investigations like any other company. Kiwibank for example is getting prosecuted at the moment by the commerce commission for fair trading act breaches

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sorry I should have been more careful with my words. The government does investigations into itself all the time, and because of the Official Information Act they results generally get made public, even if they was no issue found.

But for a company, the rules are different. If there is some legal action to be taken, then that happens whether it's SOE or company, but if it wasn't negligent then we don't have any path to get info from the internal investigation.

[–] Xcf456@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ah right that's fair enough, SOEs definitely are a blindspot from an OIA perspective. I thought you meant in comparison to a private company, which would be the same if not worse.

I think in this case a combination of the huge public interest and the heavily regulated environment transpower operates under the causes will come out. But I guess we'll see

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah my original comment did a terrible job of communicating my point 😆

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Kiwirail definitely didn't get out of being investigated.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah sorry, poor wording. What I meant was companies only get investigated when they are negligent or breaking a law, and only if they get charged do we get information about it.

Government departments will do internal investigations and then the results are accessible under the Official Information Act, regardless of outcome, so we tend to get more info if it's government.

But on thinking about it, Transpower are probably keen to give people an explanation if it was some freak accident to protect their reputation, so we may find out anyway.

[–] liv@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 months ago

Happened when my phone was on 5% so no internet for me for a couple of days. I'd forgotten how much I like candlelight.