Today in our newest take on "older technology is better": why NAT rules!
Well... I still like IPv6 better than ATM and those darn virtual circuit identifiers.
this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
316 points (85.9% liked)
Programmer Humor
19488 readers
723 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Another Technical Mistake
Hah. But to be fair, ATM did have a specific use that it worked great for. That is the move to digital voice circuits. The small fixed cell size and built in QoS meant that if you had a fixed line size you could fit X voice channels, and they would all be extremely low latency and share the bandwidth fairly. You didn't need to buffer beyond one cell of data and you didn't need to include overhead beyond the cell headers.
ATM was designed to handle the "future" or digital network needs. But, the immediate use was about voice frames and that likely dictated a lot of the design I'd expect.
I would love to start using ipv6 but my ISP decided that their devices won't support prefix delegation because "nobody uses ipv6 and nothing works with it"
I can remember an up, but would never an ipv6