this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
19 points (100.0% liked)

Brisbane

962 readers
31 users here now

Home of the bin chicken. Visit our friends:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Considering this was Toombul in 2022:

I'm not surprised it's a complex job.

Sadly, I couldn't find the clip of someone kayaking down the bikeway out the front of Toombul from the '22 floods, to make the point far more dramatically.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

To be fair, that bikeway could flood from someone bursting in to tears after a bad breakup

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Plans to redevelop the derelict Toombul Shopping Centre site in north Brisbane face indefinite delays as new flood modelling reveals the "sheer size and complexity" of mitigation work required.

The developer, Mirvac, said it did not have an estimated construction start date as it was in talks with state and local governments over flood mitigation strategies.

"We acknowledge that it has taken us longer than we had expected to get to this point, but to redevelop this much-loved site is highly complex and involves many experts as well as local planning and other authorities," Mr Hogendijk said.

"This is a detailed process that takes time, and even more so given the sheer size and complexities of the flood mitigation challenges this site presents."

Mr Hogendijk said Mirvac was required by Queensland law to reduce flood risks on the site without redirecting floodwater to neighbouring areas or waterways.

Mr Hogendijk said Mirvac was talking with all levels of government about potential grants or funding programs which could offset the cost of the green space.


The original article contains 442 words, the summary contains 173 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!