this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
210 points (96.9% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3730 readers
1229 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ **8. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 

s4e17 "Accession"

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wandering_Uncertainty@lemmy.world 46 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Even if Jellico was right about it being a superior system, he was still being a shit leader.

You don't come into a management position and instantly change everything up. You start by learning how things have been going with your staff and setting up a series of changes, with adequate forewarning, for them to adjust to reasonably.

You sure as hell don't come into a situation that's tense with time pressures, emotional pressures, legitimate causes to fear for their lives, etc, and then force a wide array of changes onto your staff.

Even if the 4-shift thing is unquestionably superior (and let's assume it is, ignoring the Bajor comments people are making) - it's still a stupid as fuck thing to do, under the circumstances.

Especially considering all the other changes and pressures he was adding on, all at the last minute, before a major battle.

Engine overhaul, protocol changes, shift changes, multi-day extreme overtime, on a staff that's emotionally distressed right before their lives will be put at severe risk?

He's an absolutely terrible captain and a disgrace to Starfleet. His bullshit would have endangered everyone's lives for no good reason, had he not been damned lucky that the battle never came.

[–] MisterMoo@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

He didn’t have time for a honeymoon with the crew.

[–] CH3DD4R_G0BL1N@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, that’s not how the military works at all. Maybe in business management, but not military. People seem to forget Starfleet is just that. The commander has a philosophy (that they will often draft a letter about when they assume command) and the unit adapts to it. People used to that are a little more understanding of Jellico and recognize that dread the enterprise crew had when they realized how good they had it under Picard.

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

People acting like Picard ran a tight ship are just deluding themselves. If Picard ran his ship half as well as, say, a modern air craft carrier then there would be no show. It'd be boring.

[–] weker01@feddit.de 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

I really wish to see more accurate depictions of military life. Strangely competent in some areas but at the same time mundane incompetence everywhere.

It would probably be boring though.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that basically what Lower Decks is?

[–] weker01@feddit.de 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Is it? Haven't watched it yet unfortunately

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 10 points 5 months ago

It's basically a workplace comedy, and one of the focuses of the show is how bad Starfleet is about making sure their strange new worlds are getting on okay a couple decades after first contact. The crew of the Cerritos are simultaneously Starfleet's best, and an absolute embarrassment lol

It's a fantastic show, that really gets the soul of Star Trek. You should check it out

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Stargate and Battlestar Galactica are closer to reality in that sense. BSG in particular.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago

It would just be people driving

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

not military. People seem to forget Starfleet is just that.

The Enterprise is a "ship of exploration", as they remind us every other episode. It has a ton of biological and astronomical labs on board. Their mission is:

to explore strange new worlds; to seek out new life and new civilizations; to boldly go where no man / one has gone before

That's the mission of a diplomatic vessel. They just also have weapons. It's 100% not a military ship. Starfleet itself is repeatedly described as not a military organization.

The only "military" version of the Enterprise D is in the TNG episode where they encounter the Enterprise C that returns from the past. It's completely different from the regular version, and the difference between the timelines is stark.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

It's 100% not a military ship.

So why is the Enterprise a critical ship every time there is a major military engagement?

Starfleet itself is repeatedly described as not a military organization.

What are the ranks in this "not a military organization" again?

The episode Jellico is in is called "chain of command". Weird title for something 100% not military.

Starfleet's primary purpose is peace and exploration yes. They still have the structure and organization of a military.

[–] CH3DD4R_G0BL1N@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Thank you. Refresh my memory, but wasn’t the whole reason Jellico took over due to Picard being hand picked for a… military special operation?

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The Enterprise is a "ship of exploration" in a way that's not possible today. You're misunderstanding them. They're like a explorer's ship in the "Age of Exploration", Captain Cook or Magellan or Christopher Columbus. Although their mission is slightly different: diplomacy vs. claiming territory.

All those ships were fast and had weapons too. Diplomacy requires weapons. Starfleet is clearly not a military. Even civilian ships today have "captains", "first officers", etc. Cruise ships have them. Even pirate ships had them. Rank and hierarchy is not exclusive to the Navy / military.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 months ago

The structure comes from the milliary though. I think that was the point they were making.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

How many Naval battles were the Endeavor, Trinidad, and Santa Maria involved in?

Starfleet didn't just send armed ships out exploring like Magellan. The Enterprise was frequently pulled out from exploring/diplomacy and sent into full battles because it was their biggest battleship.

Sisko was in Starfleet. The Defiant wasn't for exploration and diplomacy.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago

Military doesn't always equate to conquest or violence. For instance, the internet came from a milliary project.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 34 points 5 months ago

Remember that DS9 (and the Defiant) operate on a 26-hour day because Bajor has a 26- hour day. That means a three-shift rotation would have people working an extra 40 minutes each day compared to an Earth-normalized ship (almost nine hours a day).

A four-shift rotation requires everyone to work six and a half hours a day.

Hell, the idea for a three-shift rotation was probably Starfleet's idea. And the Bajorans probably went along with it just because they recently got away from pulling 18-hour days!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago (3 children)

People call Jellico a hardass and yet Riker was pissed at him because he was giving people more time off.

Jellico was Starfleet's best captain. I will die on that hill.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The biggest reason Riker hated Jellico is because he isn't Picard.

And the longer Jellico sat in the Captain's chair, the less likely Picard was coming back.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 4 points 5 months ago

I got the feeling like Riker was upset he wasn't given command of the Enterprise during Picard's absence.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Jellico was prepping for war.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

And then he stared down the whole Cardassian military by himself and won.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

I call foul: the Bajoran day (and DS9’s schedule) is based on a 26-hour day, so a 3-to-4-shift rotation would be an easier switch.

Edit: It makes more sense, anyway. 4 6-hour shifts, with a 30 min meal break each rather than 3 8-hour shifts with a ~50 minute break.

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

26, 24. 6-1/2 vs 6 hours. Mild change and still more efficient.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

See my edit, but, yeah.

It took me decades to realize that, in Chain of Command, Riker was the one in the wrong. Jelico may have been a bit… difficult here and there, but Riker was being an insubordinate child.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Riker came from Alaska and his dad seemed like the 24th century equivalent of a conservative Republican, so maybe he valued the stupid capitalist Protestant work ethic that has no place in a post-scarcity society?

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Both Riker and his dad came from Socialist Space Utopia capital: Earth. They’re a couple of impossibly-privileged people slap-fighting over hardly anything. There are worse things than father-son discord… and few things older.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But help me out with the size of the roster. Say you have 25 people needed to operate 25 stations. 3 shifts so you have 75 people on your ship.

Then you go to 4 shifts without stopping at a start base to pick up extra 25 people. And you have to put 1/3 of your crew in double shifts, or you spread it out so everyone picks up an extra shift 1/3 of the time. And in average everyone works as much as before.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Redundancy is efficiency. No ship would operate with exactly 75 people to cover 25 stations in three shift. Either some of those stations are redundant, or you have more than 75 people. Otherwise, one illness or injury would bring down the whole system.

A switch to shorter shifts would reduce redundancy on each shift, but each worker would get more rest and be less likely to burnout or get sick, even if they have to pick up occasional double shifts until they can take on more crew.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Ok kinda makes sense

Except for O Brian that keeps doing radical sports and injuring his elbow. Or Jadzia and Worfs "training" program every day like rabbits.

[–] Kaboom@reddthat.com 3 points 5 months ago

You want some overlap, that way if theres something going on, you can swap easier. And its not a big deal if someone is five minutes late.

[–] xyguy@startrek.website 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Jellico did nothing wrong. His great great great great grandfather in Detroit however.....

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

He got what was coming to him.

Just noticed for the first time his "Dr. Seussian" arms.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I do not care if he goes "zip, zap, zop,"

I do not like RoboCop.

For the robot I find most divine,

Is ED-209.

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Matched the style beautifully. Love how by Robocop 2 he stops fucking around and uses an anti-material rifle on ED-209.

[–] JizzmasterD@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

I just copied the dialogue as is. Far be it for Kira's character to speak incorrectly.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Not a settled grammar rule.

It was basically the preference of one prominent guy in 1770, and is not inherently correct in a historical sense.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I will always defer to the great scholar Weird Al, who once sagely said:

You should know when

It's "less" or it's "fewer"

Like people who were

Never raised in a sewer

This is from his epic lyrical work, "Word Crimes."