c/photography is a community centered on the practice of amateur and professional photography. You can come here to discuss the gear, the technique and the culture related to the art of photography. You can also share your work, appreciate the others' and constructively critique each others work.
Please, be sure to read the rules before posting.
THE RULES
This Lemmy Community is open to civil, friendly discussion about our common interest, photography. Excessively rude, mean, unfriendly, or hostile conduct is not permitted.
All discussion threads must be photography related such as latest gear or art news, gear acquisition advices, photography related questions, etc...
This Lemmy Community is about photography and discussion around photography, not religion or politics.
All is in the title. This is a casual discussion community.
One post, one photo in the limit of 3 pictures in a 24 hours timespan. Do not flood the community with your pictures. Be patient, select your best work, and enjoy.
If you want contructive critiques, use [Critique Wanted] in your title.
Flair NSFW posts (nudity, gore, ...)
Do not share your portfolio (instagram, flickr, or else...)
The aim of this community is to invite everyone to discuss around your photography. If you drop everything with one link, this become pointless. Portfolio posts will be deleted. You can however share your portfolio link in the comment section if another member wants to see more of your work.
Shot on an old Nikon d5100, edited on photoshop. Had to scale the image to 25% of it's original size as i dont want to waste 50mb on people's instances.
You said you edited it in Photoshop. Did you do anything beyond adjusting light levels and color correction?
Nope. I just adjusted the color, brightened up some of the shadows, and upped the contrast a bit. I used photoshop manly because I'm used to it
Here's the original unedited photo
It's funny because most people think the image automatically comes out like this, and they don't know about editing the pics to make them pop and sizzle
I can imagine you'd be able to take a similar looking photo raw as the edited version if you could control everything in the scene, but most of the time you can't control all lighting and colors, so you have to edit the image afterward. I guess that's where computational photography falls into place, but it does make a lot of errors, and obviously doesn't know how you want the image to look.
When I first started with Photography, I was clueless about how technical it is, and was just the gear itself, and then flash photography adds to it, and once you figure that out, then there was the editing and how to make colors pop. I'm 5 years into it and I am still learning. But colors have to pop to me, or else it's dull, but its also a balance of not blowing out skintones.
How do you make colors pop ?
Color saturation
Individually?
You have to play with the settings on each picture or you can do a blanket edit, but I personally do everything one by one
Nice photo and good work on the edit to make the water pop. Cellphone cameras are pretty good, but I still prefer a dedicated camera for most situations.
Most instances will prevent you from uploading "large" files. For lemmy.world, I think the cap is around 2 MB. It's actually somewhat frustrating because my (most/all?) client apps allows you to upload photos, but the upload will fail 90% of the time. There doesn't appear to be an API to check for this size limit and/or the client(s) aren't using it and resizing a temp copy of the photo before upload. I often wonder if this is contributing to a somewhat low post level... I make the vast majority of my posts from my PC for this reason if they're going to have more than one photo.
Btw thanks for the compliment :)
I usually take pictures on my phone as it's always with me, but for this specific situation, the telephoto lenses restrict too much light, and so the image becomes too noisy and artifactey as the phone tries to compensate for it being under-exposed. As for the upload limits, i was able to upload the photo at a much larger size (~8mb), but it failed to show a preview of the image, so i had to scale it down even more.