this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
91 points (91.0% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4617 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago (2 children)

He isn't a famed left wing academic. He is and always has been a pure grifter.

[–] dan42O@infosec.pub 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Could you elaborate a bit more? How so?

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago (2 children)

he's such a left-wing academic that he uncritically repeats Putin's excuses for his colonialism, imperialism, and genocide.

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Can you provide proof for the claim that he's repeating Russian propaganda? I'm reading and searching but don't find anything like that.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

He’s of the far-left school that thinks the USA can do no right, that uncritically oppose whatever the USA government does. Which makes him correct sometimes but really, really wrong on things like Russia. Russia loves people like him and supports them either directly or indirectly.

"NATO is an expanding instrument of U.S. global power that provoked Russia into a criminal invasion and occupation of Ukraine," wrote West.

https://www.newsweek.com/cornel-west-blames-nato-russias-war-ukraine-1812320

“When it comes to Ukraine, we must grasp the implications of NATO expansion and its potential to escalate into a catastrophic conflict,” West stated. He called for an end to the war in Ukraine and urged diplomatic negotiations to ensure both Russian security and Ukrainian freedom.

https://www.newsnationnow.com/politics/2024-election/biden-war-criminal-cornel-west/amp/

And, he’s not asking Russia to withdraw. He’s asking Ukraine to give up.

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

His view on Ukraine is pretty crazy, I don't think people can support him in good conscience. It's not enough to say that Russia's actions are evil if you validate their supposed reasons for invading Ukraine.

[–] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

he never said Ukraine should give up.

[–] Tom_Hanx_Hail_Satan@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 months ago (2 children)

My dad loves this joker, cus my dad is an embarrassed trump supporter. One grift to the next for him.

The only thing I could find on West saying about his "plan" for Ukraine is "I would pull back on the U.S. military support." And call for a ceasefire, all while calling himself a "jazzman of American politics" and making sure everyone recognizes the historical context of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. He specifically mentioned Alexander the Great and the Cuban missle crises.

So, withdrawaling US support while calling for an immediate ceasefire isn't what you would call "Ukraine should give up.".... I disagree. How do you characterize west's position?

https://www.democracynow.org/2023/6/7/cornel_west_2024

[–] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'd say Dr west's position is that the killing needs to stop

[–] Tom_Hanx_Hail_Satan@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

An accomplished scholar should have policy ideas that are deeper than that.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

His platform, for those inclined.

[–] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

never has he done that. he called the invasion illegal.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


But tens of thousands of signatures have been gathered on behalf of the famed left-wing academic in key states thanks to self-organized grassroots volunteers — and some help from outside operatives tied to a Republican consulting firm.

In North Carolina, for example, a prominent Republican activist was spotted in April outside a Trump rally gathering signatures for West, telling rallygoers it "helps take away votes from Joe Biden."

But internal emails obtained by NBC News, social media posts and other evidence suggest someone from the outside — though it’s unclear who or how much, if anything, they spent — was trying to help West get on the ballot in North Carolina, even if his grassroots allies were not fully aware of it.

Emails from elections officials, obtained through a request under North Carolina's Public Records Law, show the pro-West Justice for All Party authorized three people to pick up and drop off signatures for them statewide — and all three are current or past employees of a Colorado-based Republican political firm called Blitz Canvassing.

Separately, a high-profile Republican activist who focuses on early voting was spotted gathering signatures for West outside a planned rally for former Trump in April in Wilmington, North Carolina.

Stein said West has refused to discuss the issue with her and explain why he left the Green Party, adding that he's a "political novice" and that it was "hard to give him advice" about the mechanics of ballot access and running a campaign.


The original article contains 1,720 words, the summary contains 244 words. Saved 86%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 5 months ago

A couple months ago I was at the same hotel as West. I tried to extend a hand of recognition but he would have none of it. I assumed at that point he wasn't genuine. Disappointing.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There is no such thing as a "far left..." and anyone that claims that there is has dubious credibility - which includes the shitty pseudo-journalism you posted, OP.

[–] kaffiene@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It seems like a pretty standard term in political discussion. Why do you say it doesn't refer to anything?

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It seems like a pretty standard term in political discussion.

No, it isn't. It's a liberal buzzterm invented purely to facilitate liberal "botheside-ism" and nothing else - they are desperate to conflate leftist activities (such as anti-fascist or anti-racist actions leftists take) with the far right. The liberals who mindlessly gibber about the (supposed) "far left" doesn't even understand why we bother discerning the far right from the bog-standard right (of which liberal ideology is a part of).

There is no such thing as a "far left" - you're either left or you're not. Anarchism isn't "further" left than Maoism - Mutualism isn't "further left" than Liberation Theology.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Is there an accidental communist community? There should be.

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Is there an accidental communist community?

Welll... kinda.

I don't need perfect... I just need "close enough."

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Here’s a video about Cheran. I think their movement is separate from the Zapatistas.