this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
211 points (97.3% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2640 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Security services say spate of fires and infrastructure attacks could be part of systemic attempt by Russia to destabilise continent


Security services around Europe are on alert to a potential new weapon of Russia’s war – arson and sabotage – after a spate of mystery fires and attacks on infrastructure in the Baltics, Germany and the UK.

When a fire broke out in Ikea in Vilnius in Lithuania this month, few passed any remarks until the Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk, suggested it could have been the work of a foreign saboteur.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 50 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Imagine being sat at the really long table with Putin, saying how the mission to burn down an IKEA in Lithuania was a great success.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Which is a pretty counterintuitive russian tactic, ~~Bruce~~ like what better option for building long tables would there be than cheap Swedish modular furniture systems?

[–] Shellbeach@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, Bruce, what the hell?!

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

That guy is such a fuck up!

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 25 points 5 months ago

I believe this is covered in chapter three of Vladimir Putin's "How to make friends in the modern world."

[–] frankgrimeszz@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

“Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak”

Burning down an IKEA is a pretty desperate move. They also don’t seem to realise that regardless of whether Europe supports Ukraine or not, Ukraine will never surrender. As long as a Ukrainian breaths, there will be resistance to Russia.

[–] KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Maybe, it also has symbolic value, and might demoralise the civilian populace, whose support is crucial to the continued state support.

It still seems a weak move as infrastructure should be a more effective target, but who knows how many layers of distractions and attacks of opportunity really happen in the field?

[–] frankgrimeszz@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Destroying a historic monument or building to demoralise would make more sense. Instead, we have the Russian War on Low Prices.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

Nothing of this will work like that though, because Europeans are not tame and obidient in nature. A lot even rebellious. This will get more support for sanctions vs russia, military support for Ukraine and even some outrcries to strike russia directly.

[–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 months ago

So a British kid got paid by the Russians to burn down a Ukrainian businessmans warehouse? That's pretty dumb, and kinda scary. Is this going to be the start of freelance darkweb mercenaries paid by belligerent states to sabotage their home country? I hope not because the added security they'd bring in to try and stop it would make life much harder for all of us.

[–] DolphinMath 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

The Guardian – Bias and Credibility

Bias Rating: Left-Center

Factual Reporting: Mixed

Country: United Kingdom

Press Freedom Rating: Mostly Free

Media Type: Newspaper

Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic

MBFC Credibility Rating: Medium Credibility

MediaBiasFactCheck.com: About + Methodology

Ad Fontes Media Rating: Left / Reliable

Article By: Lisa O’Carroll

[–] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Wow, I definitely didn't expect that "Factual Reporting" would be "Mixed", however going through the list, it shows several instances where they misunderstood either a scientific paper or misrepresented some fact.
That said, I had before in some cases seen articles about AI being either false, misunderstanding the facts, or just parroting some CEO. I attributed it to AI being something relatively "new" to mainstream media, but this is pretty much eye opening.

I like their "long read" articles though, but I guess it's time to find a new main everyday paper for me...

[–] DolphinMath 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think this bit sums up the reason for the rating pretty well. Not sure if I completely agree, but it makes sense to me.

The Guardian has failed several fact checks, they also produce an incredible amount of content; therefore, most stories are accurate, but the reader must beware, and hence why we assign them a Mixed rating for factual reporting.

[–] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 1 points 5 months ago

That makes sense.

[–] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Uh, other journalists have called it The Gruniard for years because it has so many mistakes 😂

[–] Womble@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

That name comes from typesetting errors rather than factual mistakes (and is also a holdover from the pre-computer era when spell checking wasnt a thing)

[–] quindraco@lemm.ee -1 points 5 months ago

Reuters is the best paper out there, full stop.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

New weapon? Already forgot the arson at Czech (I think) munition depot a couple of years back?

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Security services around Europe are on alert to a potential new weapon of Russia’s war – arson and sabotage – after a spate of mystery fires and attacks on infrastructure in the Baltics, Germany and the UK.

Investigators have already alleged potential Russian involvement in an arson attack in east London, an inferno that destroyed the largest shopping mall in Poland, a sabotage attempt in Bavaria in Germany and antisemitic graffiti in Paris.

They point out that after the cold war, foreign intelligence operations consisted of spies and their handlers, but in the era of social media, vandals can be hired, leaving few connections to other attackers as pay-as-you-go saboteurs paid a few hundred euros or in cryptocurrency.

Such is the emerging concern that these hybrid attacks could be the work of Russia that the issue was raised at a summit of foreign and defence ministers in Brussels this week with Dutch, Estonian and Lithuanian security officials all warning of national vulnerabilities.

A spokesperson for Ikea said investigations were continuing into the source of the fire in Lithuania but it was among the examples, along with an attempted arson attack on a paint factory in Poland, that Tusk cited in his warning of potential foreign interference.

In April, a British man was accused of orchestrating an arson attack on two units linked to a Ukrainian businessman in an industrial estate in Leyton, east London, after allegedly being recruited by Russian intelligence.


The original article contains 970 words, the summary contains 241 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] considine@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago

The article states that there is no evidence that this is caused by Russia. But then goes on to speculate that it's caused by Russia. Journalistic standards have fallen.

[–] gcheliotis@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

So there is no evidence, just speculation. Nothing to see here then.

[–] NoSuchAgency@reddthat.com -5 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee -5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It sucks that we live in a world where it's impossible to tell if this is real, complete nonsense, or a false flag operation.

[–] WildPalmTree@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Always was.