this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
460 points (93.2% liked)

Atheist Memes

5586 readers
4 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

So, why was The Christ necessary at all?

The straightforward answer is that Christ was the right tool for the job.

If Yahweh could shape reality just by saying things and they became real, couldn’t he just say “I forgive you” and “Original Sin” would be forgiven?

That is a thing Jesus repeated ad nauseam in his ministries. And since he's an Avatar of God, this is exactly what happened.

So either Yahweh isn’t all powerful and there is some greater power to which he is subservient; or, Yahweh just wanted to dip his dick in an unwilling woman to create his son/self to torture to death.

This is an age-old paradox of language. "Can God create a bolder so heavy that he cannot lift it? Either way, he must not be All Powerful!"

But it limits the way we look at the world to an entirely and superficially magical one. The idea of God as a Wizard in a big crooked hat who says strange words and waves hands and makes a thing happen.

Consider... This paradox is solved without any magical powers. A man with a chisel and a large lump of stone can create a bolder too big for him to lift my main strength. But then that same man can build a lever/pull system to lift said bolder. He has done both! Therefore man is All-Powerful!

God's favored discipline agreed to bare a child. And that child agreed to martyr himself in order to bring about a Christian faith. And that faith exists to bring light and hope and joy to the world. And its easy enough to find a Christian who can attest to that sense of hopefulness through their faithfulness. A seed planted 2000 years ago gives birth to a forest. Feels miraculous to me.

That gets to the problem with these logical angles of attack on a religious belief. They've all been done to death for a thousand years and more. And there are rhetorical rebuttals for any smug one-liner either side can bring to the table. But you can't logic someone out of a view they didn't logic themselves into. The idea of Jesus as a spiritual martyr who provides relief for your guilt and inner turmoil isn't something you can refute casually. Its like arguing with a homopath over the effectiveness of microdosing or with a yogi over the spiritual benefits of meditation.

At the end of the day, all you're saying is "This shouldn't make you feel better!" And all they need to refute you is "Ah, but it does."

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

Christ alive (hehe) you kinda missed the purpose of the New Testament didn’t you?

Jesus was the last child sacrifice.

That’s the story.

That’s the crucifixion in its entirety.

The rest is shoehorned in AND the best part of it none of it actually happened and there is no record of it except for second hand accounts generations later.

So one of the things Roman’s were really good at, records, didn’t record a Jesus being crucified.

It didn’t happen.

[–] mranachi@aussie.zone 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I mean you last line sums it up, If on your balance you can weight the sum total of human systematic logical effort against your anecdotal experience then what is the point of discussion at all?

And you want to know when that looks really ugly? When the faithful see things like "the light and hope brought by faith" and are blind to rivers of blood and human suffering that have not ceased to this day enabled and perpetuated by faith.

It doesn't matter if there is a god, by the things done in God's name the concept of faith must be reject for humanities sake.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

If on your balance you can weight the sum total of human systematic logical effort

These are George Carlin quips, not exhaustive mathematical proofs.

When the faithful see things like “the light and hope brought by faith” and are blind to rivers of blood and human suffering that have not ceased to this day enabled and perpetuated by faith.

The blood and suffering flow as quickly from the machine logic of a Randroid Atheist as any Theocrat. Blaming a religious figment for natural disasters and manufactured cruelties is no more logical than attributing charity and compassion to the magic sky fairy.

the things done in God’s name the concept of faith must be reject for humanities sake.

That doesn't logically follow.