this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
292 points (98.7% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2315 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not that simple: Here's article 5:

“The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security.”

Article 5 is invoked If it constitutes an armed attack. In this case, food insecurity is not an armed attack.

[–] sorenant@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Putin used his hands, therefore arms, to sign the decision which means it's an armed attack. ARTICLE 5

[–] maik@infosec.pub 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have arms and I feel attacked. ARTICLE 5

[–] sorenant@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

That's your fault for not having bear arms as the second amendment wanted you to.

[–] Ronno@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Are you sure you want WWIII? Because that’s basically what you are preaching.

Listening to the stories of my grandparents, another World War is not something I want

[–] procrastinator@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

There is no way WW3 doesn't lead to nuclear destruction of our planet

[–] sorenant@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

How about a global special military operation then?

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If only the powers that could have opposed the belligerent nation in WWII had tried negotiation and peace before rushing in to battle!