this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
105 points (88.9% liked)

politics

19050 readers
3904 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Republicans, in one of the more moronic takes of the election season, say that if Biden is too old to run for office, then he's too old to hold the office and should resign.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 103 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Who the fuck said he's too old to hold office?

Joe Biden is too old to win our bullshit popularity competition of an election - he can do the job just fine.

Similarly, I'm an ace of a senior developer, but drawing out a complex algorithm on a white board will stop dumb companies from ever hiring me.

[–] 5redie8@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

Bold of you to assume they're attempting to make an argument in good faith in any capacity

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why would that stop them from hiring you?

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's mostly newer programmers who remember how to design a complex algorithm on the fly because these are taught in college and then used as study tools to land a job. Over the past decade or so, software companies started requiring these algorithm tests during interviews. More senior developers don't want to go back and study for something that really won't do much to help them at all, except in interviews.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So very true. It's designed to be a nudge-nudge, wink-wink way of carrying out the ageism.

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I think it comes more down to the fact that companies want an easy way to get butts in seats at the lowest cost possible. Including these silly tests eliminates most of your candidates, making your job of filling those seats much easier. And, conveniently enough, the people who pass tend to cost less! Imagine that.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I also think they want more gullible, naive and pliable workers. People that won't ask any difficult questions and go along with all the happy horseshit that corps like to sling. These tend to be younger.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Part of the reason for such performative job hiring shenanigans is to have an excuse for ageism.