this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
214 points (88.8% liked)

politics

18883 readers
4527 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Democrats are about to get fucked hard, and their hubris did it to them

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

You mean, like in 2016? No. Surely not. No.

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee -2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

We all know there is no one they could run that would make you happy.

[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I would vote for anyone. I would vote for Biden, but very much do not want to. If they put someone else in there who wasn't also a fascist, then I'd vote for them. The problem is that Biden is not doing very well and is being a shit by not listening to anyone around him. Democrats are fucking retarded because this should have been happening 2 or 3 fucking YEARS ago. The Democrats are incompetent pieces of shit who are also the only thing keeping this country together. They need to behave like they actually know how to govern.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Biden himself literally said at least 50 democrats would win against Trump.

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

The clown I responded to admitted that the democrats can’t run anyone they’d vote for. So what Biden says or does is irrelevant. They even admitted to being here to actively convince people not to vote.

They’re essentially here to get Trump elected- intentionally or not.

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That's correct, the party as a whole do not represent the working class. I would speculate most democrat voters agree but feel trapped in the 2 party system and would never vocally discuss their dissatisfaction for fear of being ostracized by their peers.

Case in point, the other reply to yours

Edit sp

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

So tell me, again- how much do you think you’ll accomplish by doing nothing? Additionally- when in history has doing nothing helped a situation like this? I’d love for you to name an event. Just ONE event in history where not voting brought a positive change. Because by not voting, you’re essentially saying you’re okay with things the way they are and are willing to let chance dictate the lives of others.

And tell me again how you want age restrictions on candidates. If you had your way- We’d never have even had a shot with Bernie. And he’d be retired.

You can cry all you want that the system is broken, but at the end of the day- it isn’t going to be changed by a bunch of blowhards staying home and whining on the internet.

Oh, and lastly:

If we’re going to be judged on how people respond to us, you probably should delete your account and find something better to do with your time. Because it seems you spread a lot of misinformation and troll quite frequently.

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world -5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

We are ideologically opposed and will not support your candidates. We do not want the same future as liberals, we are not on your side.

Liberals have more in common with their republican counterparts than any leftists have with democrats

[–] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

So…. You didn’t bother answering my question I noticed. Is it that you know the answer will unravel your entire argument?

Tell me- when has not voting brought change?

We both know the answer. You’re just too afraid to say it out loud because doing so, will force you to face the fact that you’re actively working against everyone that is trying to avoid America becoming a dictatorship.

You’re not ever getting what you want. You know that, right? Because clearly politics don’t work the way you think it does- this is evident in the fact that what you want contradicts itself entirety. In order to get what you want- LAWS HAVE TO CHANGE. But you refuse to vote for the people that actually would change those laws.

In essence- you’re fine with things the way they are and don’t give a shit enough to take the effort do actively do anything g to change it.

instead- you’re fine to have no active role in making America a better place for marginalized citizens.

Oh, and thank you for at least admitting you don’t give a shit. I know it wasn’t a direct statement, but we all got the message loud and clear.

[–] dvoraqs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then are you more aligned with the Republicans or the Democrats? Like it or not, the election system only supports two parties. That's what we should be pushing towards changing rather than hurting ourselves.

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm not aligned with either, they represent the donor class, not us. They represent money while we get tossed table scraps.

The idea of reforming within is futile, no new blood obtains any positions of power until it's determined they are not a threat to the existing power structure.

[–] dvoraqs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Third parties under the First Past the Post voting system are literally the threat to the power structure that will just keep them pushed down by the major parties.

The major parties may be afraid of sharing power now, but they are also seeing the threat of losing power completely when they can't keep their coalitions together.

We see Democrats making a major move today with Biden stepping down from the race in order to placate parts of the party that are very unsatisfied. The threat is already more real today than it has ever been.

I think that people will realize that we are all in alignment about reforming the election system being better for the country, even to preserve a large part of the current power structure.