Welcome to the RD thread!
This is a place for casual random chat and discussion.
A reminder for everyone to always follow the community rules and observe the Code of Conduct.
Mobile apps:
Quick tips:
- Use Teddit.net or Safereddit when posting Reddit links.
- Upload videos to Streamable or Image Chest.
- Miss the old.reddit look? Try running the site through mlmym.
- Want to use the full real estate of your wide screen? Go to user Settings and set Theme to "xx Compact".
Footnotes:
- Daily pixel art by Paul Sabado
- Report inappropriate comments and violators
- Message the moderation team for any issues
Map of literacy rates per municipality according to the 2020 census. If the vast majority (1508/1634) are above 90% literacy, is it worth it?
Edit: Is it also worth it to post such huge-ass, 1:1,000,000 maps on Lemmy?
Edit: Made it 1:2,000,000 , and added a legend and per-province map.
For a moment I thought it's representing low literacy rates because of all the red.
Yes, which is why it isn't recommended to use reds often to represent data as it has a negative connotation by default. Source: I do mapping, cartography, and gis work.
But would you recommend blue to red if you wanted to highlight, say, towns which are more Kapampangan speaking?
I don't recommend it. Generally, you would want to use one hue for low to high values of sequential data but you can use 2 hues to increase contrast (e.g., light blue to dark blue, light yellow to blue). Blue and red are opposing colors and is more used as diverging scales where there are neutral tones (and values) in the middle (e.g., negative values, zero, positive values; blue-pale yellow-red). Here's a nice resource on color schemes, https://colorbrewer2.org