this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
33 points (97.1% liked)

Rust

5989 readers
24 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits

  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

My understanding is that should almost only ever be set for WASM. Certain low-memory machines may also want it, but that's extremely rare.

I'm not sure who's recommending it, only ever seen it recommended for WASM applications.

[–] BB_C@programming.dev 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Certain low-memory machines may also want it

This is a part of the misconceptions about it.

It doesn't meaningfully help with that unless much harder constraints are applied in development where it would become relevant at run-time. It can be relevant for low-storage machines however. That's what binary size is primarily about after all. And low-storage and low-memory may go hand in hand at times as device properties.

I’m not sure who’s recommending it

See the link in my other comment.

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 2 points 4 months ago

To be clear - I'm referring to devices with, say, 128MiB of device storage and memory when I refer to low memory machines (which I've developed for before actually). If you've got storage in the GB, then there's no way optimizing for size matters lol.

[–] soulsource@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago

And for it to be a worthwhile saving in low memory or storage situations, further constraints need to be met too. For instance, you would need to compile your own standard library, or go fully no-std...