this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
692 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4637 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago (2 children)

One good deed does not redeem the entire sect

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Was it really a good deed though? Because by missing, he gave Trump a shit load of political ammunition.

Trump is going to take this crisis and abuse it for every vote it gets him, and it's gonna get him a lot.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Trump is going to take this crisis and abuse it for every vote it gets him, and it’s gonna get him a lot.

So what you are saying is that Trump is a "Crisis Actor" lmao

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Given that he is essentially unscathed, yes.

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's an interesting question. If someone could go back in time to try to shoot Hitler but ended up missing, would it still be a good deed?

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Hardly an if, that's essentially what actually happened:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichstag_fire

Fascists will always use a crisis to gain more power. If the Rechstag fire had actually killed Hitler, then yeah, it probably would have been a good thing. But in the end it didn't, it just gave Hitler more power. This situation with Trump isn't much different.

Granted, hindsight is a big factor here. But I think I've made my point.

[–] Xenny@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He hasn't though. He buried this story with his VP pick and the documents case.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Trump burying news about him with more news about him is to his advantage. And I guarantee you Trump will continue milking the assassination attempt. It isn't buried by a long shot.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes it was a good deed even though it failed.

[–] CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

I think it’s more accurate to say it would’ve been a good deed. Rn it’s just good intentions.

[–] DynoNoob@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If Trump were to trip down the stairs and break his neck, that would be one thing. Becoming a martyr is another. And becoming a martyr while still alive is even worse.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Hes only a martyr to the imbecilic koolaid drinkers. The rest of us see him as a cancer that needs drastic excision

[–] Yearly1845@reddthat.com 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

OK but there are a fuckin lot of koolaid chuggers

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Fair to Midland. His first election was because they didn't think they didn't need to show. Hopefully we convince people to show.

[–] UnaSolaEstrellaLibre@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah but half of Americans stand behind him lol