this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
296 points (93.5% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2997 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I hate that this is the debate we’re having now

I also hate that I’m feeding into the NYT’s lazy and transparent attempt to undo their previous partisanship with new opposite partisanship like those two things cancel out and add up to journalism

But what the hell, if that’s where we’re at, this is a relevant data point about the landscape

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So you're just straight-up announcing your intention to immediately dismiss any answer you're given.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No, I am warning them that I plan to show the poll numbers comparing Biden to whoever they select. Dismissing is different from debunking with evidence. But yes, I plan to debunk whatever they say, assuming it’s realistic enough to be found in a list of even some pretty outlandish Democratic possibilities.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well, you intend to paste a graph that doesn't take into account that no potential candidate other than Biden has campaigned at all, and that despite Biden's campaigning, his numbers are still shit.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Moving goalposts is good clean fun, isn't it? I am finished though. I have chased them around for as long as I wanted to.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You're taking advantage of a catch-22. No one's numbers can go up until they campaign, and no one's gonna campaign unless Biden steps aside.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Their numbers will go down after the Russians and right-wing media launch their anti-campaign against the new nominee. It's much easier to smear someone than for them to get a positive message out. Especially if you can lie and not be held accountable.