this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1276 readers
67 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
dgerard@awful.systems
1
"we have 700m people in our network. We think it's not unreasonable to at least get 50% more people as a result of personalization, culturalization, deeper, more immersive experiences." EA exec on AI (techraptor.net)
submitted 6 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

goddamn, did chatgpt create his answers

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I wonder if that 30% is an accurate assessment of the time saved when they stop taking the llmcode inputs seriously in review

[–] carlitoscohones@mas.to 1 points 6 months ago

@froztbyte @dgerard

If every other measure is equal, and there are 30% more human fingers created, that means EA is 30% more efficient, by this measure. 13-fingered soccer players.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

i don't know where that number could actually have come from. i mean it came from his arse, but which analyst report did he have ready to vaguely justify it if he ever had to

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 1 points 6 months ago

just vibes

below 30% is "why bother", above 30% is suspiciously "wait how". 30% is nice and cozy, with not too many questions

totes the kind of efficiencies you could squeeze out by checks notes "eliminating human friction on delivery"

imagine all those pesky questions from minions going away! progress!