this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
1124 points (98.9% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2673 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Multiple parties are jockeying for position in the aftermath of France's seismic snap election. The leftist New Popular Front (NPF) insists its ideas should be implemented.

France's left wing New Popular Front (NPF) - now the largest group in parliament - has called for a prime minister who will implement its ideas including a new wealth tax and petrol price controls.

The leftist alliance secured the most seats in the recent French elections but fell short of the 289 needed for a majority in the National Assembly, France's lower house of parliament.

President Emmanuel Macron's Together bloc came in second and Marine Le Pen's far-right National Rally (RN) party finished third.

France's parties are now jockeying for position and it's unclear exactly how things will shake out, but the NPF has insisted it will implement its radical set of ideas.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Not_mikey 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You could tax based on citizenship, could make it the same €400,000 limit so it doesn't effect normal expats and lower the rate a bit. Yeah the ultra rich can just buy citizenship in another country but many have at least a smidgeon of patriotism and won't want to lose there citizenship.

[–] TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Only the US and Eritrea are stupid enough bullies to tax on citizenship. Terrible f'cking idea.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.de 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It is actually an excellent idea, because it ensures billionaires don't just move to Switzerland to evade taxes.

[–] TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Income and gains should only be taxed in the jurisdiction they are earned. Only stupid Americans with a world view that consists of one country would argue otherwise. That's literally what tax is for. Not to fund your country in your absence.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They can vote while living abroad, if they can choose who others live under the others should be able to tax them.

[–] TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In most places you cannot vote if you live abroad. In the US, you also cannot vote in anything but national elections of you don't reside in a state.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I'm saying that, it is the case they are one of two with citizen status taxes and there is at least some reasoning given you can vote while living abroad.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.de 1 points 2 months ago

If "should" is all the argument you've got, I'm not convinced.

[–] bitflag@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

And only the US actually collects on it, because they are so at the heart of the financial world they can strongarm banks to report on their US clients.