this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
626 points (89.0% liked)

Political Memes

5457 readers
3666 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ferrous@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If, 30 years from now, the choice is between a democrat who wants 5 genocides and a republican who wants 10, will you still cling to American electoralism as hard as you are now? Will you still be militantly democrat?

This logic isn't sustainable.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

The correct answer for genuine supporters of Harm Reduction via electoralism is usually yes, as that's the logic of electoralism. Anything else is to admit you simply have a different "no return" threshold from others.

The fact of the matter is that you either stick to your guns about believing in electoralism, and no matter what vote for the lesser evil among the 2 largest candiates, or you don't. If you don't, you're picking where you draw your personal line in the sand.

For some people, genocide at all is a line, domestic or foreign. For others, foreign is fine, domestic is not.