People Twitter

5226 readers

2486 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1546

Controversial Thesis (i.imgur.com)

submitted 4 months ago by TehBamski@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

125 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Paying via taxes is not charging students.

You do not pay taxes based on your use of public education or use of any other public service but based on your income and/or wealth.

If you do not make sufficient income as a student to pay taxes or enough taxes to cover the cost of your education your public education is in fact free to you.

[–] witx@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

What I meant is someone has to pay for it, it's not free lunch. You're right that the students don't pay it through taxes, but someone has to. Myself as a working person do pay for others through taxes

Edit: as people seem to have failed to see my point: I'm glad my taxes help pay for other's studies

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why do you think OP is not aware that there are costs to be paid but merely disagrees with using sports as a way to pay for it?

You even used the word Utopian. Well most universities are not financed via sports even non public ones. Far from Utopian.

[–] witx@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

A society which charges students to acquire knowledge values neither.

Because this is literally what he said. He never mentioned sports, just charging in general.

I understand his sentiment, but it's not practical.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Charging students ≠ paying for the education through taxation as a public good

It must be practical as it is the normal way university works in much of the industrial world

[–] witx@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 4 months ago

Yes yes go read my other comments.

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It is practical; Wholely tax funded universities do not charge students.

[–] witx@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yes I think we both agree with that. It was a misinterpretation on my part of OP arguments: no charging at all vs charging students

[–] LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Don't think of it as paying for others, think of it as paying to live in a more civilised society. You benefit from talented doctors and engineers that cannot otherwise afford college being a part of your society. Heck, even if they can tackle student loans, which would you prefer, a dentist stressed about making the next payment or one that is carefree and can focus on fixing your teeth with as little pain as possible?

[–] witx@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Read my comment again, you entirely missed my point: I want to think about it as paying it for others. I'm all for it I'll gladly pay taxes to allow others to go study, it's one of the things I'll defend fiercely. An educated society is a better one

[–] LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Oh, my bad! I get it now!