this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
66 points (98.5% liked)

Australia

3616 readers
62 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Baku@aussie.zone 43 points 4 months ago (3 children)

In Melbourne we do this thing where we let developers build suburbs with zero infrastructure, refuse to put buses or other public transport in when asked because it's "not viable", then a decade later we will put a bus route in, but then bitch and whinge because nobody's catching it. Then maybe 5 or 6 decades after that, we'll order a feasibility study to see if we should build a train station there, then it'll be deemed to expensive and we'll wait another century before deciding to spend insanely high amounts of money on either building an underground station, or acquiring a shit ton of land.

If somebody would use their damn brains and realise it is cheaper and easier to at the very least plan for and reserve land in these new developments for public transport, and these new suburbs would stop being opened without bus stops, supermarkets, and GP clinics, we'd all be better off...

[–] joannaholman@aus.social 17 points 4 months ago (2 children)

@Baku @ajsadauskas we could learn some things from China who are willing to build metro stations in the middle of overgrown fields they know will be developed in the coming years

https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/chongqing-china-metro-station-nowhere/index.html

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 months ago

I think metro stations are a bit overkill, especially for Australia's cities. I'd settle for the government releasing solid plans for train lines in new areas, and developers being required to cede the land for them while building out new suburbs. As well as increasing the taxes on those developers profits, directly into a fund to pay for the line to be built.

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

we should stop posting one off things as examples of 'good' or 'bad'. it just makes things that are actually good seem impossible to achieve.

[–] smegger@aussie.zone 5 points 4 months ago

Sounds like a standard government planning process to me. :(

[–] DarkSpectrum@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

It's amazing how much impact the privatisation of land development has, there are missed opportunities across the environmental and sustainablity fronts.