Also, none of those kludges would have even been necessary if the project scope was properly defined from the start and the project manager didn't let the users keep trickling in new requirements without also extending the deadline.

So yeah, how dare I go back and implement something the way it should have been done the first time?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] joshcodes@programming.dev 68 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Nice try Microsoft, I still don't like your monthly "small" ui changes that hide the features I use and add extra "get copilot now" buttons

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 29 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Nice try Microsoft

That's the most insulting thing anyone has ever said to me. 😆

[–] joshcodes@programming.dev 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

My bad, what linux distro you running?

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Debian 🤘

[–] joshcodes@programming.dev 6 points 4 months ago

Eyyyy, I'm on Mint!

[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Debian Stable?

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yep, though "Debian Stable" is a bit redundant lol.

[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What's with Debian Sid?

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Its for testing

[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So how redundant is it distinguish between Debian Stable and Debian Sid?

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 months ago

I don't know I don't use testing

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 months ago

They even put a "Github CoPilot" button to Visual Studio FFS. Fortunately they at least added an option in the config, which unlike most UI elements in VS requires a restart. But at least it can be removed I guess.

Didn't think MS would enshittify VS because "Developers! Developers! Developers!" but here we are.