this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
1212 points (97.0% liked)

Memes

45643 readers
1260 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
1212
A simple solution at cost of minor aesthetic changes (feddit.de)
submitted 1 year ago by Oiconomia@feddit.de to c/memes@lemmy.ml
305 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jfx@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I thought he wanted nuclear energy in cars?

[–] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Small nuclear reactor in your car is stupid, but I would love if every city had its own nuclear reactor. Central power and heating!

[–] jfx@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm aware of the Nucleon, that is why I don't want this in my car. But, I would love to have a tiny nuclear reactor in my neighborhood substation or something

[–] SinJab0n@mujico.org 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why would I want a ducking bomb under me ? No, I want I city with solar+nuclear power energizing public transport and THEN maybe u could use a battery personal vehicle to move like an autonomous trolleybus.

My problem with "electric" cars right now is where the energy comes from.