this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
546 points (96.1% liked)

memes

10181 readers
2548 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 133 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (7 children)

Because teaching isn’t about having the smart kid demonstrate that they know the answer, it’s about getting the kid who doesn’t understand the question to engage and learn.

Any of you who may one day have children would do well to understand the above.

[–] ultimitchow@sh.itjust.works 43 points 4 months ago (2 children)

i can't think of a better way to get shy kids to engage and learn than to figuratively put them on a pedestal in front of the whole class and have them demonstrate that they don't know the answer.

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Plenty of shy kids don't raise their hand even if they do know or could quickly find the answer with a little engagement.

Yes, it's uncomfortable for them to pick them anyway but it's better than just giving them a bad grade.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

If you see learning as "I always must know all the answers when asked by a teacher" you will never learn.

[–] Johanno@feddit.org 29 points 4 months ago

I understand that but one teacher completely killed my joy in a subject. He at some point never took me to answer a question even when I was the only one raising a hand. So I stopped contributing.

[–] umulu@lemmy.world 24 points 4 months ago

I am a teacher and can confirm that you're right.

[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

100% I need to know what that kid is thinking, so I can guide them to the answer.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe try doing that in a way that doesn't publicly shame them.

[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sure, how? Engagement is a tricky thing, and kids "cheat" on homework and look up answers. Hearing from a student in class is the best way for me to see their thought process.

[–] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is there a reason you can't simply keep this child in for a few minutes when everyone is on recess to ask them what they're struggling with?

[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Because I don't know their struggling until I hear their thought process. Hell, they usually don't know they're misunderstanding things until they start trying to explain the concepts I'm asking them about. Which is why I want to hear from every student periodically.

-edit- also I teach older kids. No recess.

[–] halykthered@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Anyone can put out information. Checking comprehension and ensuring understanding is an entirely different thing.

[–] endbringer93@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Yeah, nah. There is nothing "getting to engage and learn" about calling you to the front of the class to solve an equation knowing full well that you won't be able to then proceed to berate you while never explaining dick. Literally only made me skip class.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip -3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)