this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
310 points (97.8% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
301 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PuddingFeeling907@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Fascism will keep rising if the people do not put pressure on the liberals to enact proportional representation.

[–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why is this fascism? Seems like good old fashioned religious intolerance and violence.

Though this article skipped some details on that aspect.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Why is this fascism? Seems like good old fashioned religious intolerance and violence.

Which, let's be honest, tends to be best buddies with fascism...

[–] SleezyDizasta@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Actually fascism tends to be secular. The authoritarianism is derived from an extreme version of nationalism. The authoritarianism in theocracy is derived from religion. Fascism β‰  authoritarianism. There's a lot of other authoritarian ideologies out there. Marxism is another example.

[–] northmaple1984@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

The the majority of large, brutal facist and authoritarian regimes of the last hundred or two years were secular: Nazi Germany (paid Christianity lip service near the beginning but that fell off as some churches opposed and loyalty to the state became more important), the USSR, Mao's China, and other smaller non-USSR communist regimes that committed massive atrocities (such as the Khmer Rouge)

[–] atro_city@fedia.io -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What's the definition of liberals to you?

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The Liberal party of Canada promised electoral reform (in two separate elections!) so they're probably referring to that

[–] Thelemmybud@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The ndp campaigned for it too. Parliament needs to pass proportional representation for the people so we can have more choices and more accountability.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Totally agree. I'd love to see the NDP take Parliament but it seems unlikely to ever happen with strategic voting... Probably the reason the Liberals keep going back on their promise of reform

[–] Thelemmybud@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Well if the liberals are shortsighted they will be locked out of power forever with the conservatives under Pierre Poilievre. He threatened to suspend the charter of humans rights and liberties whenever he so pleases just like the conservative premiers like Scott Moe hurting trans children.