this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
1104 points (96.8% liked)

Political Memes

5415 readers
4554 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It would similarly reverse clintons impeachment since lying to Congress was as president and therefore an official act.

No, this decision wouldn't affect that at all. This decision covers criminal prosecution, not impeachment. Now, if Clinton had been indicted, tried, and convicted of perjury for lying to Congress after Bush was elected in 2000, then it would be unwinding that conviction, if it was determined that it was an official act as president.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't think that actually matters, if a president is immune from serious criminal prosecution the same reasoning would make them immune from civil.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand what you're saying here.

Impeachment isn't a criminal process. It's also not civil. Impeachment is it's own thing, outside of the judicial system. A prosecutor can't impanel a grand jury and have the grand jury impeach an elected or appointed official. If Clinton had been both impeached and removed from office, this decision would do nothing to affect that.

On the other hand, if he had left office, and then had been criminally charged for lying to COngress, while he was sitting as President, and was convicted, then this decision would be unwinding it.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Impeachment is by definition civil. If I can shoot you in the face and get immunity then I can certainly lie to Congress. They're pretty literally saying it's absolute immunity.

"High crimes and misdemeanors" the president is immune to them all now. Criminal, civil, administrative, doesn't matter with absolute immunity comes absolute power.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It’s not a civil or criminal matter. Impeachment is inherently a political process. This ruling has near-zero bearing on it.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's civil the clause even specifically refers to civil officers, it's a civil process like every other process don't by the government. There is no such thing as a political process.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It’s not civil because it doesn’t sit in the jurisdiction of a civil court or a court sitting in equity. Stop trying to use technical terms when you clearly have no grasp of their meaning.

There is such thing as a political process and the doctrine behind it was laid out decades before you were born. If you’d care to learn about the topic there have been countless law review articles written on the subject.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

It doesn't need to be in a court to be a civil matter it just needs to be codified in law and not criminal. I'd say you need to take your own advice.

There's simply not, there's administrative process but literally zero "political process" exists in law in the United States. None.