Malicious Compliance

19517 readers

4 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

We ENCOURAGE posts about events that happened to you, or someone you know.
We ACCEPT (for now) reposts of good malicious compliance stories (from other platforms) which did not happen to you or someone you knew. Please use a [REPOST] tag in such situations.
We DO NOT ALLOW fiction, or posts that break site-wide rules.

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

2265

Work from home (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/maliciouscompliance@lemmy.world

206 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Makes me think that with the hybrid they expect to have the best of both worlds, while in fact it will likely be the opposite.

Besides, with a mandatory fixed amount of days per quarter it gets soooo bullshit, it's not hybrid it's just barely glorified office work

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Especially when the "hybrid" model involves more days in office than at home.

I guess execs don't work when they're at home and can't handle not getting distracted, so they just assume the same for everyone.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago

Especially when the "hybrid" model involves more days in office than at home.

Wdym "especially", of course it does /s but not really