this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
61 points (93.0% liked)

Privacy

31814 readers
278 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi,

A friend wants to degoogle his phone, so I suggested the OS I'm currently using. The one we can't talk about... He wants a small/compact phone, so I suggested pixel 4a (not buying second hand though), but I'm afraid that planned obsolescence may kill the phone rather soon. What's your opinion?

Cheers and thank you for your help,

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think phones are the MOST secure devices most people have. They are locked down, they run software in very restricted containers, they have more restrictive feature allowance. for 99% of the people the phone is the most secure device, full stop.

Can you do better on a computer? Sure, but it takes a bunch of work and isn't the out of box experience

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Please help me understand your point of view. So far all you have said in this conversation is that other people are wrong. That may be, but your not helping us understand you

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The key to encryption is to have your key encrypted with a strong passphrase.

Phones are literally designed to be convenient. Convenient is the antithesis of security.

You want a 20-100+ character passphrase to symmetrically encrypt your private keys, and you want to never type that in public.

Most people have 4 digit pins on their phones, and they constantly type them in public, in plain view of others. And its super easy to snatch out of their hands and run.

Phones are, by design, not secure devices. Marketing teams trying to sell you something say otherwise. Don't be gullible.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

TPM in the SOC to transform the "convenient" pin into more robust encryption keys is the gold standard for civilian devices.

"computers" (of which a phone very much is) also use a TPM for this very reason.

But even taking what you say as gospel, the device isn't insecure, its how people are using it.

I will stand by my comments a phone is the MOST secure device a civilian will use. Even with a secured desktop computer where someone diligently types in a 64 bit random code to unencrypt the hard drive... if they use the computer as a general purpose device, the threat surface raises dramatically. Now information and programs are not compartmentalized, install one bad program and it can trivially take over everything.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

TPMs protect the data on the drive if the drive is separated from the computer. If the drive is still in the computer, then it doesn't protect the data. It doesn't provide protection from physical attacks.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/hardware-security/tpm/tpm-fundamentals

Devices that incorporate a TPM can create cryptographic keys and encrypt them, so that the keys can only be decrypted by the TPM. This process, often called "wrapping" or "binding" a key, can help protect the key from disclosure.

This is how cell phones and windows hello justify short pins, the pin goes into a rate limited TPM that then discloses a larger key to decrypt the actual secret.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Do you need me to link to the vulnerabilities of TPMs? They do not provide physical security.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Does this mean your also against yubikeys?

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 2 points 4 months ago

Hardware keys can be used well to increase your secuirty (U2F MFA) or used to increase convienence and reduce security (passwordless auth)

It depends how the tool is used.