Melbourne

1869 readers

49 users here now

This community is a place created for the people of Melbourne and Victoria. We are a positive, welcoming and inclusive community. We might not agree about everything, but we always strive to stay civil and respectful.

The focus of our discussions is based around things that effect Victoria, but we are also free to discuss our local perspective on wider issues. Or head to the regular Daily Random Discussion thread to talk about anything.

Full Community Guidelines

Ongoing discussions, FAQs & Resources (still under construction)

Adoption Certificate for Nellie, the Daily Thread numbat (with thanks to @Catfish)

Feedback & Suggestions

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

lodion@aussie.zone

RustyRaven@aussie.zone

briongloid@aussie.zone

bot001@aussie.zone

Daily Discussion Thread: 🍲 ☕🍵 Tuesday, June 25, 2024 (aussie.zone)

submitted 4 months ago by Seagoon_@aussie.zone to c/melbourne@aussie.zone

130 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Baku@aussie.zone 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What did you try that they didn't, if you can share?

[–] tombruzzo@aussie.zone 3 points 4 months ago

What I think confused them is the Business Portfolio had a similar name to the page, so maybe they didn't realise there was a difference.

On this page you can see who has access and what business portfolio a page is under https://www.facebook.com/settings/?tab=profile_access

The business portfolio id is used as part of the URL for Facebook Business Centre, so I replaced the id for a business centre I had access to with the problem business portfolio. Fortunately they still had access to that business portfolio and could accept the request to disconnect that page from the old portfolio, opening it up to joining a new one.

This only worked because they had access. We would still be stuck if it was controlled by someone else