this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
456 points (98.9% liked)

Privacy

4171 readers
5 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
iopq@lemmy.world
456
[USA] Appeals court rules that cops can physically make you unlock your phone (reason.com)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Boozilla@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.world
226 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

How does it work? Can someone use a specified finger to trigger the password requirement?

[–] Syn_Attck@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Passcode. Not fingerprint.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ah. Then I guess I don't see how this is related to the post.

[–] Syn_Attck@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It's not, technically, but if I have sensitive documents on my phone and a law officer is trying to get me to unlock my phone, I will be entering and/or putting the duress code into my phone. GrapheneOS has 'lockdown' button by 'restart' and 'shutdown' all of which will require a passphrase to unlock, even if you normally have fingerprint enabled for X hours each time of use.

So it's semi-related in that GrapheneOS protects against this type of attack.