this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
550 points (97.6% liked)

Enshittification

1548 readers
2 users here now

What is enshittification?

The phenomenon of online platforms gradually degrading the quality of their services, often by promoting advertisements and sponsored content, in order to increase profits. (Cory Doctorow, 2022, extracted from Wikitionary) source

The lifecycle of Big Internet

We discuss how predatory big tech platforms live and die by luring people in and then decaying for profit.

Embrace, extend and extinguish

We also discuss how naturally open technologies like the Fediverse can be susceptible to corporate takeovers, rugpulls and subsequent enshittification.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't know if it's just me, but browsing virtually any mainstream website without an ad blocker or with alternative frontends is becoming harder and harder to justify. It's getting to the point where adblocking isn't an optional luxury - it's a requirement to effectively get basic information about things.

Yesterday, I was trying to search some information about Ghouls from Fallout. This lead me to this Fandom wiki page which had ads on almost every corner of the website, autoplaying video in the corner, asking for my age as soon as I clicked on the site, injecting polls and random unrelated videos into the communty wiki content and being incredibly slow to browse. A query that in the past that took 5 seconds now takes 50, for what? Money?

I get that online services cost a shitton amount of money to operate, but the sheer level of degrading quality is not OK. This is just one example of how services are completely barreling towards the shitter at 100+ MPH with no brakes or airbags. I feel some guilt for using content blockers, but that guilt is being wittled away every single day because of websites like this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I use an ad blocker on my notebook, always have. When I browse on my phone I am often shocked by the amount of ads on websites. I clicked on a link from Lemmy yesterday and the website was 95% ads. It was one sentence of the story followed by one or two large ads, then another sentence of the story and another one or two ads. The whole site was like that. I don't want to read your story that badly. Unfortunately, many of the ads had already impressed by the time I left so the shitty website got their $0.001 of ad revenue from my visit.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

When I browse on my phone I am often shocked by the amount of ads on websites.

This is why iPhones are an immediate nonstarter for me. Can't run Firefox with ublock origin on iPhone while you can on Android.

[–] Skyline969@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago

AdGuard has a good Safari plugin. There’s also stuff like Consent-o-Matic for cookie popups and Amplosion to get rid of AMP pages (if they’re still a thing - completely forgot about them after installing Amplosion).

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I run uBlock Origin on my desktop in Chrome. I use the Chrome browser on my Pixel.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Yup. The enshitification for profit of their stuff is proceeding apace. I suspect that they're going to get some push back from the EU given how utterly fucking shitty their ad vetting is but we'll see.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Why do you not adblock on your phone?

AdAway is good and has both root and non-root modes

[–] solarvector@lemmy.zip 18 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Firefox now supports uBlock Origin on mobile too

No solution for Apple I'm aware of though, since it's forced to be a shitty reskin of Safari

[–] SOMETHINGSWRONG@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

iPhones have had AdGuard for years and it works on apps outside the web browser as well.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Plus you can configure to default to reader mode. Generally no ads, no stupid formatting, just what you want to read!

Unfortunately that’s why so many sites have their “click to continue” button, so I don’t see the full article unless I click to hide reader mode

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 months ago

And has for a few years now.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yea, but doing it at the system level is WAY better. I'm always rooted, so I can't speak for how well it works on non-root phones. But my phone is like 99% ad-free even across apps, the Google news feed and browsers incl Chrome

Between that on my phone, network level ad blocking, and ad blocker browsing extensions I can go days or even weeks without seeing an ad. And when I do, it's usually because it was on a TV at a store or something and rarely the odd ad that somehow leaked through

[–] MacedWindow@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Thank you! Had no idea this existed. Just downloaded and donated so you just helped the dev!

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

The last time I looked there wasn't anything worth running on my Pixel. I haven't looked since.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The website didn't get money from views. They only get money from clicks. The ad company, though, yup.

I actually had a similar experience with the BBC today, of all sites!

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh...I thought they got a fraction of a cent for impressions and more for clicks.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Well, it's been a while since the last time I looked into it. Maybe things have changed, but I doubt it.

Video platforms may operate that way, though.