this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
351 points (98.3% liked)

Photography

4496 readers
7 users here now

A community to post about photography:

We allow a wide range of topics here including; your own images, technical questions, gear talk, photography blogs etc. Please be respectful and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The last shot I posted gained some traction, so I felt like sharing some more of what I’ve done with my scanner camera. The scan is done from top to bottom in about 2 minutes, the model did a great job of staying still throughout.

While scanning motion is definitely eye-catching and spectacular, there are other qualities to appreciate. The gorgeous soft, yet tack sharp aesthetic of large format photography is easily available with a scanner.

Usually I fight the IR-super sensitivity of the sensor, but this time it made her skin iridescent against the rock in the background.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Leavingoldhabits@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

In basic principle it’s a pinhole camera using a scanner as the photosensitive surface. I’ve stuck a magnifier glass to the front, it gives some sharpness and a lot of possibilities outside of a simple pinhole.

There’s a picture of the camera in my comment history, its violently unimpressive

[–] lechatron@lemmy.today 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Pretty much what I expected it to look like! It's really interesting and I bet will make for some fun photos. Basically a very slow horizontal shutter.

[–] Leavingoldhabits@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

You’re spot on, it’s a really slow rolling shutter. I like the idea of focusing in on what is normally considered an undesirable artifact and elevating it to become the centerpiece. Messing around with motion gets some wild results and is a lot of fun!

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What kind of angle of view do you think you get with this setup? I imagine it would be pretty wide, but could be way off.

[–] Leavingoldhabits@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’m not really one for numbers, and I don’t know understand your question.

If a 180 degree cone in front of the lens is the widest, I think this setup can do something like 80 degrees, and does its best work between 50 to 70. That said, this purely finger in weather approximation, I’m not really interested in the numbers when I do these shots

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Thanks! If you happen to also shoot traditional cameras, speaking in terms of say FF EQ focal lengths works too. It does indeed sound pretty wide, with a sweet spot between 24mm and 35mm FF EQ.