this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
68 points (87.0% liked)

Public Health

375 readers
3 users here now

For issues concerning:

🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.

Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)

Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
otter@mander.xyz
otter@lemmy.ca
68
Justice Department formally moves to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug in historic shift (apnews.com)
submitted 5 months ago by otter@lemmy.ca to c/publichealth@mander.xyz
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] turtlepower@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Eh, fair enough. I'll concede that the stuff from legal states is not safe: as a medical user, when I finally got my card and was able to get access to medical, I noticed a remarkable difference in how I felt before, during, and after, compared to the stuff I got from friends in recreational states. Why? Because the recreational industry focuses on THC. They strive to max out the THC levels, and totally disregard the rest of the cannabinoids, making for a not good time, especially long-term/heavy use. Yeah, high THC is cool, but have you tried high Beta Myrcene? They grab on to a buzzword and drive it into the ground to its own detriment. Those of us that are educated on cannabis know it takes an entourage effect. This is why I think it needs to be made fully legal, but either heavily regulated so the corpos can't ruin it further, or keep a medical program that knows what it's doing.

Also: nothing in existence is 100% "safe". Anything can kill/harm you. Let's not be stupidly pedantic.

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Also: nothing in existence is 100% “safe”. Anything can kill/harm you. Let’s not be stupidly pedantic.

This if anything is stupidly pedantic. Yes, everybody knows nothing is literally 100% safe, but there's a big difference between claiming cannabis is completely harmless and that eg. water is completely harmless. I really don't understand why people get so incredibly defensive over the idea that maybe the psychoactive drug they're ingesting might possibly have harmful effects. Frankly if anything is stupid it's treating harm reduction as "pedantry"