Linux

5237 readers

52 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

Why openSUSE? (reddthat.com)

submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by Telorand@reddthat.com to c/linux@programming.dev

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

First, let me be clear up front that I'm not promoting the idea that there should be one "universal" Linux distro. With all the various distros out there for consumers, there's lots of discussion about Arch, Debian, and Fedora (and their various descendant projects), but I rarely see much talk about openSUSE.

Why might somebody choose that one over the others? What features or vision distinguishes it from the others?

Edit: I love all the answers! Great stuff. Thanks to everyone!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] boredsquirrel 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think there is. KDE settings deal with Bluetooth, devices etc. Discover deals with repos and more.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Every time I've tried to use discover it was a mess. I think you can use it if you use nothing else, or you're better off forgetting about it entirely.

[–] boredsquirrel 1 points 5 months ago

I use it with Fedora Atomic KDE, rpm-ostree is not meant for that and a pain to use so I remove the package.

The Flatpak integration doesnt use PackageKit and works well, but it doesnt display the data nicely and is too slow. GNOME software is way better for Flatpaks, COSMIC Apps is way faster.

It is useful for fwupd but at the same time a bit bulky for that.

It is also a frontend for all the KDE Extensions and works very well here.