Greentext

4399 readers

1517 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

923

Anon interviews for a job (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 5 months ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

136 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Depends on what is being censored. Hate speech? Censor the shit out of it. Sexual stuff? Not needed.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Nope. Completely missed the point.

What is unspoken there is that censorship is always based on good intentions such as yours. People trying to censor sex are trying to do the same thing you’re trying to do with censoring hate speech.

“Only censoring the bad stuff” is not the solution here. It’s the source of the problem.

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 2 points 5 months ago

Automated censorship is never a good thing.