PC Gaming

8555 readers

661 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca

UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca

KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

171

Valve faces a £656 million lawsuit in the UK for 'overcharging 14 million PC gamers' (www.gamingonlinux.com)

submitted 5 months ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca

131 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works -25 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Then you go after the publishers next.

It's clear that Valve's cut has an influence because it being a % it means that as development costs go up the price of the games need to increase exponentially to compensate for the 30% Valve gets no matter the price.

To quote myself for some numbers:

It you need to make 30$/copy to cover costs in 2015 and Steam is taking 30% you need to sell for 43$/copy, Valve is making 13$/copy.

Development costs go up by 20% over the next 10 years, you now need to make 36$/copy to cover costs, with Steam's cut you now need to sell for 51.50$, Valve is making 15.50$/copy.

If it was 15% instead? 35.50$ and 42.50$ would be the prices.

[–] Brokkr@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's just how numbers work. Those aren't exponential increases, they are proportional. 30% will always be 30%.

There's no benefit to sensationalizing the math.

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

Sounds like the claims people made saying move from physical to digital would result in cheaper prices. Then you see games when they weren't on steam still going for $60 or $70 despite being launched on their own platform where they pay no cut. Same for games launched only on consoles by the console owners.