this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2024
118 points (99.2% liked)

Privacy

31814 readers
299 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
118
Chat surveillance law by the EU Parliament? (results.elections.europa.eu)
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
 

The results are showing up... Now we have to hope for the law to be declined... Already discussed about the chat control law of the EU, here : https://lemmy.ml/post/16469106

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] eveninghere@beehaw.org 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I read that and hoped for further information.

[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In fact it would be "scanned" by AI for searching all the kinda sexual, abusive stuff... In fact to protect children

[–] eveninghere@beehaw.org 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But the link described it as if it'll do database matching to find well-known images.

[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's why it's a scan, like done apple with their gallery. Scan signatures, AI recognition etc...

[–] eveninghere@beehaw.org 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

No, what I've interpret from the webpage is far more basic. Just matching images, almost like pixel-by-pixel. If you think about it, legally describing your interpretation (Apple's gallery) is very challenging and is thus possibly infeasible.

As a result, my feeling is that the EU is going with a far inferior method that doesn't have to send images to the server. Technically speaking (they might still require that).