this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
808 points (95.9% liked)

memes

10440 readers
2637 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] egeres@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This was one of the points of contention with the quantum revolution of the beginning of the 1900's, schrödinger came up with the equation, which fitted like a glove for a lot of scenarios, but it had an imaginary component, which baffled a lot of people since it could imply reality uses such numbers at a fundamental level

[–] Papergeist@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"Imaginary" is just a misnomer. Descartes basically ran a smear campaign against them.

[–] egeres@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's actually a good point I had never considered! In a way you could consider that "negative numbers are imaginary as well"

[–] Papergeist@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

And that's never something I considered. You can't see a negative amount of apples. Must be imaginary!

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

What's really screwy is you can force light to only travel as a evanescent wave. It's completely undetectable without a second interaction, but light must transmit energy using the purely imaginary part of the complex wave.

The imaginary component definitely has some physical meaning, it's not just a useful mathematical trick.