this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
930 points (99.1% liked)

linuxmemes

21172 readers
962 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] PeggyLouBaldwin@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    most of the things i want to send around my network in archives are already compressed binary files, so i just tar everything.

    [–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    You reinvented zip and didn't even know it.

    [–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    tar was nearly and adult when zip was born.

    [–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    See my reply here: https://midwest.social/comment/10257041

    The two aren't really equivalent. They make different tradeoffs. The scheme of "compress individual files, then archive" from GP is what zip does. Tar does "archive first, then compress the whole thing".

    [–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    The link does not load for some reason, but tar itself does not compress anything. Compression can (and usually is) applied afterwards, but that's an additional integration that is not part of Tape ARchive, as such.

    [–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 5 months ago

    Yes, I'm aware of how this works.

    The important point is that zip and compressed tarballs have overlapping but not identical purposes.