this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2024
470 points (95.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43394 readers
1558 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] andrewta@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (7 children)

90s because they used logic in designing things. Now they change for the sake of change.

[โ€“] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Like how there was a damn good reason for the start menu button to be on the button right: you could fling your mouse the lower left and no matter if you did it too far or fast, it would always hit the corner, and be at the start button. You never had to "target" the start button, you simply went all the way down to the left. Didn't even have to look.

So obviously, they must of had an equally smart, thoughtful reason to put it in the middle, right? That's a decision born from utility, not aesthetics. Clearly not making a painfully obvious attempt at copying their main competitor.

[โ€“] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz -2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

What on earth are you talking about? What start button is in the middle?

[โ€“] Luccajan@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

I think this is about windows 11 and Microsoft's stupid decision to move the start menu to the middle

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)