this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
288 points (99.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1900 readers
709 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] protist@mander.xyz 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Declining a bribe makes you automatically biased? Huh?

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 months ago

Yes.
Even if I believed someone were innocent, if someone attempted to purchase my vote, I would be personally offended, and immediately view the defendant as untrustworthy. It would bias my judgement.

The article states that the judge removed the jury member from the case and swapped in an alternate. The judge is also sequestering the jury, so they must spend the remainder of the case in a hotel - hopefully avoiding any other attempts to bias the jury.

[–] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Elmo has no idea how juror selection works.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 months ago

Your comment requires elaboration.

What happened here was jury tampering, and it occurred after jury selection.

How would jury selection factor in?